Posterous
Kyle is using Posterous to post everything online. Shouldn't you?
Imgp1362_thumb
 

Fresh Geologic Froth

Foamy digital flotsam for me and you

« Back to blog

Lost in the woods? You need LiDAR.

Last week I had the chance to explore the upper McKenzie River valley in the Oregon Cascades. My tour guide was a UO PhD student in volcanology. She was showing me the range of interesting lava-water interaction features that characterize the valley. A very cool and unbelievably scenic place. 

Luckily, she has some LiDAR data of the area. This was my first chance to hit the field with LiDAR in hand of an area covered by old-growth forest. In other words, entirely non-trivial vegetation cover that is disconcerting in both its density and its scenic values. Two main conclusions: 

1. It is amazing how well the LiDAR data reveal the topography through a dense forest cover. I knew this, but living it for a day was very convincing. Many small to medium scale details in the surface of a thickly forested Holocene lava flow are painfully obvious in the imagery (below). For the desert rat in me, they were easier to see in the imagery than they were on the ground at first. Eventually, I was able to relate the two once I could see past the forest, but the imagery was far more revealing of the local geomorphology. 

Typical scene in the field area...locally, forest cover is thicker. Photo from surface of the lava flow evident in imagery below.

2. The LiDAR in this case also revealed some major features that had previously gone unnmapped at a fundamental level. We found / explored a very prominent volcanic feature in the midst of the lava flow that, according to the 24k USGS base and the 10 m DEM, does not exist. However, it is almost absurdly obvious in the LiDAR data. Mind you, this feature is not trivial in scale. It tops out at nearly 90 m above the valley floor and is has a 150 by 200 m footprint. It (the 'Pimple') is extremely steep-sided (as we discovered climbing to the top). It is also enigmatic geologically...potentially a glacially modified and exhumed volcanic fissure. Not sure on that.

Looking down from the Pimple. A seriously steep hike.

The 24k topographic map rendition of the area shown in the two LiDAR images.

Slope-shaded map of the LiDAR data

Hillshade map of the LiDAR data.

The point is that this very conspicuous feature is very mappable, but was overlooked in the development of the 24k map. A bit surprising in that it corresponds to a major 'peak' in the forest canopy. I will admit, however, that if you were out there in the rain, you could walk right by it. Certainly makes you wonder what else out there has gone unnoticed by the USGS topographic maps we once relied so heavily upon. Yikes...

Thanks to ND for the field trip and the LiDAR map snips.

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Oct 25, 2009
 said...
I wish our state was interested in investing in LiDAR. Two interesting things regarding USGS topos in our state:

1.) There's high demand for the "old" 1:24000 scale, 10-ft contour topos as opposed to the "newer" 1:25000 scale metric ones-- the newer ones were contoured from DEMs, and don't have a lot of the detail that the 1:24000 ones have.

2.) In many places in Mass. the 1:24000 scale topo maps are just plain *wrong*... it's been a common practice of mappers in the central part of the state to re-survey the topography in some places to make an accurate base to work off of.

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     Connect     twitter